Research Paper
Acta Biochim Biophys Sin
2005,37: 851–856
doi:10.1111/j.1745-7270.2005.00112.x
Establishment and Utilization of a
Tetracycline-controlled Inducible RNA Interfering System to Repress Gene
Expression in Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Cells
Fan YANG, Yun ZHANG, Ying-Li CAO, Shu-Hui WANG*, and Li LIU*
Department of Microbiology and Etiology,
Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and
Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100005, China
Received: February 27, 2005
Accepted: September 26, 2005
This work was supported by
the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30370324
and No. 30230200) and the Beijing Natural Science Foundation (No. 7032035)
*Corresponding authors:
Li LIU: Tel, 86-10-65296454; Fax,
86-10-65240529; E-mail, [email protected]
Shu-Hui WANG: Tel, 86-10-65296454; Fax,
86-10-65240529; E-mail, [email protected]
Abstract RNA interference (RNAi), a posttranscriptional gene
silencing process mediated by small double-stranded RNA specifically
complementary to the targeted transcript, has been used extensively in the development
of novel therapeutic approaches against various human diseases including
chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Here, we report the successful construction
of a tetracycline-controlled siRNA in CML cell line K562. A K562 cell line
stably expressing the reverse tetracycline-controlled transactivator (rtTA) was
constructed. A tetracycline responsive element (TRE) was integrated into the
RNA polymerase III promoter region of pBS/U6 that was used to drive specific
siRNA to target the novel cytokine receptor-like factor 3 (CRLF3) gene.
The results show that rtTA was able to recognize the TRE to prevent
siRNA-mediated exogenous and endogenous CRLF3 gene repressions.
Moreover, CRLF3-siRNA mediated gene repression could be induced in a
dose-dependent manner in the presence of doxycycline. Thus, the inducible
siRNAi system in K562 cells might be useful for the study of RNAi-mediated
therapeutic approaches against CML.
Key words inducible siRNA; tetracycline; reverse
tetracycline-controlled transactivator; U6 promoter; CRLF3
RNA interference (RNAi) is a posttranscriptional gene silencing process
mediated by small double-stranded RNA, 21–23 nucleotides in length,
which is specifically complementary to the targeted transcript [1]. RNAi
effectors can be endogenous microRNA, small hairpin RNA (shRNA) and synthetic
small interfering RNA [2]. These small RNAs can intracellularly activate an
RNA-induced silencing complex to turn on targeted gene repression [2]. Only
six years since it was discovered, RNAi technology has been speedily developed
and is likely to become an exceptional case of the shortest transfer time from
basic research to application. One of the main focuses has been the application
of RNAi in leukemia research [3].Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) involves a reciprocal
translocation between chromosomes 9 and 22 that results in a fusion protein
BCR/ABL with enhanced tyrosine kinase activity [4,5]. BCR/ABL possesses a
highly oncogenic capability in transforming hematopoietic progenic cells into
leukemic cells [5]. Wilda et al. designed a specific shRNA to target the
bcr/abl fusion gene and found it had a potent effect on silencing
targeted gene expression and inducing apoptosis in leukemic K562 cells [6]. It
is believed that bcr/abl expression is essential for the survival of
leukemic cells such as K562 because it constitutively activates an autocrine
loop of intracellular mitogenic signals [7]. Thus, there are at least two
aspects to the side-effects of using direct RNAi to the bcr/abl gene:
(1) the rapid death of the targeted cells hampers the kinetic and mechanistic
evaluations on the effect of BCR/ABL-RNAi ex vivo, such as at the
cellular level; (2) it also makes it difficult to study the knock-down effect in
vivo because the modified cells are unable to be further manipulated. To
overcome these obstacles, an inducible bcr/abl expression cassette has
been used in growth factor-dependent cell lines, such as BaF3 and 32D [8,9].
Although these cell lines have been used successfully for RNAi studies by
repressing the expression of the integrated bcr/abl fusion gene
[10,11], the kinetic, mechanistic and animal evaluations on wild-type leukemic
cell lines such as K562 are still limited. The sophisticated device described
by Ohkawa and Taira [12] for tetracycline-controlled antisense RNA synthesis
can be directly applied to inducible RNAi studies [13]. By now, the inducible
RNAi technology has been applied to numerous cancer-related studies, such as
colon carcinoma [14,15], gastric adenocarcinoma [16], breast cancer [17] and
prostate cancer [18]. However, inducible RNAi in leukemic cells is yet to be
reported or tested. In this study, we report the successful establishment of a
tetracycline-controlled siRNA system in CML cell line K562. We found that this
system was efficient in repressing both exogenous and endogenous cytokine receptor-like
factor 3 (CRLF3) gene expression. This system can be further extended to
study bcr/abl RNAi both at the cellular level and in an animal model
system.
Materials and Methods
Target gene cloning
Total RNA of CML K562 cells (Cell Bank of Institute of Basic Medical
Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College,
Beijing, China) was isolated using RNAzol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, USA) according
to the manufacturers instructions. The CRLF3 gene (GenBank accession
No. NM_015986) was cloned from K562 cells using a one-step reverse
transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) kit (TaKaRa, Tokyo, Japan)
with forward primer 5?-tatagtcgaccatggagctggagcctgagct-3?, and reverse primer 5‘-tatactcgagctaaaacactaacactttcc-3‘.
RT-PCR was conducted as follows: 50 ?C
for 45 min; 35 cycles at 94 ?C for 30
s, 58 ?C for 30 s, 72 ?C for 2 min; and a final extension at 72 ?C for 10 min.
Plasmid construction
After SalI/XhoI digestion, the PCR product of CRLF3
was subcloned into pCMV-Myc and digested with the same restriction
endonucleases to generate pCMV-Myc-CRLF3. To construct the pIREShyg2-reverse
tetracycline-controlled transactivator (rtTA) plasmid, a 1.8-kb DNA fragment
containing CMV promoter and the rtTA coding sequence from pUHD172-1neo were
ligated into pIREShyg2 (Invitrogen) digested with NruI/StuI. The tetracycline responsive element (TRE) was introduced into the
promoter region of pBS/U6 (provided by Dr. Yang SHI, Harvard Medical School,
Boston, USA) through PCR with primers 5‘-ttgatagagttataaatatcccttggagaaaagcc–3‘ (PmU61)
and 5‘–tgatagagtactttacagttagggtgagtttccttttg-3‘ (PmU62). PCR conditions were: denaturing at 95 ?C for 5 min; 35 cycles at
94 ?C for 1 min, 58 ?C for 1min, and 72 ?C for 5 min; and a final extension at
72 ?C for 10 min. The 5‘ end of the PCR product was phosphorylated by T4
polynucleotide kinase (TaKaRa) to prevent self-ligation.Four primers were synthesized as follows: O1a, 5‘-ggtacagtctgagcagtcgaa-3‘;
O1b, 5‘–agctttcgactgctcagactgtacc-3‘;
O2a, 5‘-agctttcgactgctcagactgtaccctttttg-3‘; and O2b, 5‘-aattcaaaaagggtacagtctgagcagtcgaa-3‘.
O1a and O1b, O2a and O2b were annealed to form duplexes. The duplex products were
step-wisely subcloned into pBS/U6 or pBS/U6-TRE to construct pBS/U6-siCRLF3 or
pBS/U6-TRE-siCRLF3.
Cell culture, transfection and selection
For the establishment of the K562 cell line stably expressing rtTA,
approximately 15 mg pIREShyg2-rtTA was transfected into 1?107 K562 cells in a 60 mm culture dish. After 24 h, transfected K562
cells were seeded at approximately 1?105 cells/well into a 96-well plate under the selection of 1000 mg/ml hygromycin
(Sigma, St. Louis, USA) for approximately two weeks. The hygromycin-resistant
colonies were picked up and expanded in the 10 cm dishes for further analysis.For the detection of rtTA gene expression in K562/rtTA cells,
RT-PCR was performed using the Thermoscript RT-PCR system (Invitrogen). The
forward primer was 5‘-accatgccaaagagacccag-3‘, and the reverse
primer was 5‘-tcgcgccccctacccacc-3‘. RT-PCR conditions were: 50
?C for 30 min; 35 cycles at 94 ?C for 30 s, 58 ?C for 30 s, 72 ?C for 1 min;
and a final extension at 72 ?C for 10 min.K562/rtTA cells were cultured in 60 mm culture dishes containing
RPMI 1640 medium (HyClone, Logan, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum
at approximately 1?106
cells/ml at 37 ?C with 5% CO2. After 2 d, the cells were transfected
with 10 mg of plasmid pBS/U6-TRE-siCRLF3 using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen)
following the manufacturers instructions. Two days posttransfection, the cells
were collected and lysed for immunoblot analysis.
Western blot analysis
Cells were lysed in lysis buffer containing 1% Nonidet P-40 (NP-40),
50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 120 mM NaCl, 200 mM NaVO4, 1 mg/ml leupeptin,
1 mg/ml
aprotinin and 1 mM phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride. The products were applied onto 10%
sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, then transferred to
a nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, USA) which was
subsequently blocked in 10% non-fat milk. The membrane was first probed with
either anti-Myc or anti-b-actin then with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary
antibody, and visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) kit (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, USA).
Results
Introduction of one copy of TRE into the promoter region of pBS/U6
We employed a PCR-directed cloning approach to integrate one copy
of bacterial tetracycline operon TRE into the promoter region of pBS/U6. PCR
was conducted to amplify the whole plasmid sequence of pBS/U6 using primers PmU61
and PmU62 containing the TATA box and the proximal sequence element (PSE),
respectively [Fig. 1(A)]. Then the linear pBS/U6 DNA with
modification sequences at both ends was produced. After self-ligation, the
tetracycline-controlled pBS/U6-TRE vector was constructed. Successful cloning
will render an extra SacI site at the junction position between PSE and
TRE. After SacI digestion, pBS/U6-TRE was produced with two expected
bands (1.9 kb and 1.3 kb), whereas pBS/U6 had only one band [Fig. 1(B)].
The pBS/U6-TRE vector was further used for the construction of
pBS/U6-TRE-siCRLF3 (data not shown).
Establishment of K562 cell line stably expressing rtTA
In the Tet-on system, the binding of rtTA to TRE can repress
downstream gene expression, but the high affinity interaction between the
substrate doxycycline (Dox) and rtTA will release the inhibition to turn on gene
expression [19,20]. In order to establish the Tet-on system, we built a K562
cell line that can stably express rtTA protein. Plasmid pIREShyg2-rtTA was
transfected into K562 cells. After a 2-week selection, 15 hygromycin-resistant colonies
were isolated and expanded. Eight colonies were selected for RT-PCR analysis
and two colonies were positive for rtTA gene expression (Fig. 2).
The positive colonies were named K562/rtTA and used for inducible RNAi
analysis.
Inducible RNAi-mediated CRLF3 gene repression in K562/rtTA
cells
To evaluate the tetracycline-controlled RNAi system in K562/rtTA
cells, CRLF3, a newly cloned cytokine-like factor 3 gene with unknown
function, was chosen as a targeted gene. pCMV-Myc-CRLF3 was co-transfected into
K562/rtTA cells with pBS/U6-TRE-siCRLF3 or pBS/U6-siCRLF3. pBS/U6-siCRLF3
served as both the Dox-unresponsive negative control and the CRLF3
shRNA-mediated RNAi positive control. Fig. 3 shows that pBS/U6-siCRLF3
significantly repressed CRLF3 gene expression independent of the
addition of Dox. In the absence of Dox, pBS/U6-TRE-siCRLF3 was unable to affect
the expression level of CRLF3 (Fig. 3), indicating that rtTA was able to
fully recognize TRE to prevent RNA polymerase III (Pol III)-mediated siCRLF3
transcription. In contrast, as the dose of Dox increased to 1 mg/ml or 5 mg/ml,
TRE-siCRLF3 significantly repressed CRLF3 gene expression, respectively
(Fig. 3), indicating that Dox was able to release rtTA-mediated Pol III
promoter inactivation to induce specific CRLF3 shRNA transcription, and
in turn activate CRLF3-RNAi-mediated gene repression.
Inducible CRLF3-RNAi efficiently inhibited endogenous CRLF3
gene expression
The next question is whether the tetracycline-controlled RNAi system
could effectively inhibit endogenous CRLF3 gene expression. Our
preliminary study indicated that CRLF3 has a high level of gene
expression in numerous human cell lines including HEK293 (data not shown). To
directly address the utility of this inducible RNAi system for the inhibition of
endogenous CRLF3 expression, pIREShyg2-rtTA was co-transfected with
pBS/U6, pBS/U6-siCRLF3 and pBS/U6-TRE-siCRLF3 into HEK293 cells. Consistent
with the results shown in Fig. 3, pBS/U6-siCRLF3 markedly inhibited
endogenous CRLF3 gene expression regardless of Dox (Fig. 4).
Moreover, rtTA could recognize TRE to prevent pBS/U6-TRE-siCRLF3-mediated
endogenous CRLF3 gene expression (Fig. 4). Differently from
pBS/U6-siCRLF3, pBS/U6-TRE-siCRLF3 was able to induce Dox-dependent CRLF3
gene repression when Dox concentration reached 5 mg/ml (Fig. 4). Thus,
the result demonstrates that the Dox-inducible RNAi system can effectively
inhibit endogenous gene expression.
Discussion
Conditional expression of gene-specific RNAi has become an important
tool for the study of temporally- and spatially-regulated gene functions. It
has many advantages and great potential for therapeutic purposes [21,22]. In
this study, we successfully established a tetracycline-controlled inducible
siRNA system in CML K562 cells. K562 cells stably expressing rtTA protein were
able to fully recognize the integrated TRE from the modified U6 promoter.
Moreover, inducible siRNA was induced to repress both exogenous and endogenous
CRLF3 gene expression. This system may be useful for further biological
and therapeutic studies on K562 cells. Pol III promoter usually contains three sequence elements important
for its promoter activity: the TATA box, PSE, and the distal sequence element
(DSE) [23]. Study on the Pol III promoter of the H1 gene has indicated
that eliminating the sequence element immediately upstream of transcriptional
start site does not significantly affect promoter activity [24]. Thus, the
tetracycline operator TRE can be placed between the TATA box and the transcription
initiation site to functionally mediate RNAi responses with no harm to Pol III
function [18,25]. We showed that integration of the TRE element between PSE
and the TATA box of mouse U6 promoter was also effective for Dox-mediated gene
repression (Figs. 1 and 3). Similar results have been documented
in the inducible-RNAi studies of human U6 promoter [12,26]. However, the
substitution of the sequence between PSE and TATA by TRE has been shown to
significantly impair H1 promoter activity [24]. This discrepancy might be due
to the structural differences between H1 and U6 promoters. In H1 promoter, DSE
is compact and closely adjacent to PSE [24], but in U6 promoter, DSE and PSE
are separated by a 148 bp spacer element [23]. Thus, placing TRE between PSE and
TATA in H1 promoter might have a more direct impact on the binding of
transcriptional activators to DSE than that in U6 promoter. Like conditional knock-out technology, the inducible RNAi system
offers an alternative method for biological researchers to study essential gene
functions in vivo and evaluate therapeutic potentials when the essential
gene is selected as an RNAi-targeted gene. Negeri et al. employed this
technology to study the functions of Bx42 during Drosophila
development and found that Bx42 is essential for the development of many
tissues through its interaction with Notch signaling [27]. In addition,
researchers have been trying to develop an effective RNAi-mediated therapeutic
approach against CML since the beginning of RNAi technology. Direct RNAi
targeting at BCR/ABL was effective in killing the leukemia cells [6].
The mechanisms underlying this process are difficult to elucidate, but an
understanding of them is particularly important for the application of
efficient RNAi drugs against this type of disease. Another critical point is to
control the viability of the RNAi-targeted cells when the manipulated cells are
needed for animal study. Therefore, the establishment of an inducible RNAi
system in leukemia cells will be in immediate demand for the therapeutic study
of RNAi in CML.Our results show that the tetracycline-inducible siRNA in K562 cells
established in this study was sensitive to inducing the degradation of
exogenous gene expression, and also effective in the knockdown of endogenous
gene expression. K562 cells are usually detached, possess suspension cell
characteristics, and are difficult to modify. Therefore, the successful
establishment of an inducible RNAi system in K562 cells might provide an in
vivo platform for mechanistic studies of CML pathogenesis. Future work
will focus on the design of an inducible RNAi to specifically target the BCR/ABL
fusion gene in K562 cells.
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank Dr. Liang-Hu QU (Zhongshan
University, Guangzhou, China) for critical comments on the manuscript.
References
1 Sharp PA. RNA interference?2001. Genes Dev 2001, 15: 485–490
2 Meister G, Tuschl T. Mechanisms of gene
silencing by double-stranded RNA. Nature 2004, 431: 343–349
3 Borkhardt A, Heidenreich O. RNA interference
as a potential tool in the treatment of leukaemia. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2004,
4: 1921–1929
4 Rowley JD. A new consistent chromosomal
abnormality in chronic myelogenous leukaemia identified by quinacrine fluorescence
and Giemsa staining [letter]. Nature 1973, 243: 290–293
5 Laurent E, Talpaz M, Kantarjian H, Kurzrock
R. The BCR gene and philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemogenesis.
Cancer Res 2001, 61: 2343–2355
6 Wilda M, Fuchs U, Wossmann W, Borkhardt A. Killing
of leukemic cells with a BCR/ABL fusion gene by RNA interference (RNAi).
Oncogene 2002, 21: 5716–5724
7 Hariharan IK, Adams JM, Cory S. bcr-abl
oncogene renders myeloid cell line factor independent: Potential autocrine
mechanism in chronic myeloid leukemia. Oncogene Res 1988, 3: 387–399
8 Nieborowska-Skorska M, Wasik MA, Slupianek A,
Salomoni P, Kitamura T, Calabretta B, Skorski T. Signal transducer and
activator of transcription (STAT)5 activation by BCR/ABL is dependent on intact
Src homology (SH)3 and SH2 domains of BCR/ABL and is required for
leukemogenesis. J Exp Med 1999, 189: 1229–1242
9 Klucher KM, Lopez DV, Daley GQ. Secondary
mutation maintains the transformed state in BaF3 cells with inducible BCR/ABL
expression. Blood 1998, 91: 3927–3934
10 Scherr M, Battmer K, Winkler T, Heidenreich O,
Ganser A, Eder M. Specific inhibition of bcr-abl gene expression by
small interfering RNA. Blood 2003, 101: 1566–1569
11 Scherr M, Battmer K, Schultheis B, Ganser A,
Eder M. Stable RNA interference (RNAi) as an option for anti-bcr-abl therapy.
Gene Ther 2005, 12: 12–21
12 Ohkawa J, Taira K. Control of the functional
activity of an antisense RNA by a tetracycline-responsive derivative of the
human U6 snRNA promoter. Hum Gene Ther 2000, 11: 577–585
13 Shi H, Djikeng A, Mark T, Wirtz E, Tschudi C,
Ullu E. Genetic interference in Trypanosoma brucei by heritable and
inducible double-stranded RNA. RNA 2000, 6: 1069–1076
14 Gelman MS, Ye XK, Stull R, Suhy D, Jin L, Ng
D, Than B et al. Identification of cell surface and secreted proteins
essential for tumor cell survival using a genetic suppressor element screen.
Oncogene 2004, 23: 8158–8170
15 Wang S, El-Deiry WS. Inducible silencing of
KILLER/DR5 in vivo promotes bioluminescent colon tumor xenograft growth
and confers resistance to chemotherapeutic agent 5-fluorouracil. Cancer Res
2004, 64: 6666–6672
16 Higuchi M, Tsutsumi R, Higashi H, Hatakeyama
M. Conditional gene silencing utilizing the lac repressor reveals a role of
SHP-2 in cagA-positive Helicobacter pylori pathogenicity. Cancer
Sci 2004, 95: 442–447
17 Chen Y, Stamatoyannopoulos G, Song CZ.
Down-regulation of CXCR4 by inducible small interfering RNA inhibits breast
cancer cell invasion in vitro. Cancer Res 2003, 63: 4801–4804
18 Czauderna F, Santel A, Hinz M, Fechtner M,
Durieux B, Fisch G, Leenders F et al. Inducible shRNA expression for
application in a prostate cancer mouse model. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31: e127
19 Gossen M, Bujard H. Tight control of gene
expression in mammalian cells by tetracycline-responsive promoters. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA 1992, 89:
5547–5551
20 McGuire SE, Roman G, Davis RL. Gene expression
systems in Drosophila: A synthesis of time and space. Trends Genet 2004,
20: 384–391
21 Stevenson M. Therapeutic potential of RNA
interference. N Engl J Med 2004, 351: 1772–1777
22 Teixeira SM, daRocha WD. Control of gene
expression and genetic manipulation in the Trypanosomatidae. Genet Mol
Res 2003, 2: 148–158
23 Paule MR, White RJ. Survey and summary:
Transcription by RNA polymerases I and III. Nucleic Acids Res 2000, 28: 1283–1298
24 Myslinski E, Ame JC, Krol A, Carbon P. An
unusually compact external promoter for RNA polymerase III transcription of the
human H1RNA gene. Nucleic Acids Res 2001, 29: 2502–2509
25 van de Wetering M, Oving I, Muncan V, Pon Fong
MT, Brantjes H, van Leenen D, Holstege FC et al. Specific inhibition of
gene expression using a stably integrated, inducible small-interfering-RNA
vector. EMBO Rep 2003, 4: 609–615
26 Matsukura S, Jones PA, Takai D. Establishment
of conditional vectors for hairpin siRNA knockdowns. Nucleic Acids Res 2003,
31: e77
27 Negeri D, Eggert H, Gienapp R, Saumweber H.
Inducible RNA interference uncovers the Drosophila protein Bx42 as an
essential nuclear cofactor involved in Notch signal transduction. Mech Dev
2002, 117: 151–162